Research article
Survei serangan hama baru Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcsidae) pada pertanaman pepaya di Kabupaten Bogor

Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access

Highlights

Generate NLP AI by Wizdam ID.

Abstract

Hama tanaman pepaya, Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) menyerang ribuan tanamn pepaya di Bogor pada tahun 2008. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan daerah persebaran dan tingkat serangan kutu putih pepaya, yang berlangsung dari bulan Agustus sampai Oktober 2009. Sampel penelitian diambil pada daerah-daerah sentra produksi pepaya di Bogor. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa serangan hama P. marginatus telah tersebar merata di seluruh wilayah Bogor, dengan serangan berat terutama terjadi di wilayah barat dan tengah Kabupaten Bogor. Kecamatan yang menunjukkan tingkat serangan berat pada semua desa survei adalah Kecamatan Sukaraja, Caringin, Megamendung, Bojonggede, Tajurhalang, dan Rancabungur.

Keywords

Hama tanaman pepaya
Paracoccus marginatus
Bogor

Introduction

Introduction from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Section snippets

Material and Methods

Materials and methods from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Results

Results from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Discussion

Discussion from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Conclusions

Conclusions from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Acknowledgment

Acknowledgment from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Funding Information

UMMU

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Ethical approval acknowledgements

No ethical approval required for this article. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5)

Supplementary files

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study, and/or contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References (1)

Amarasekare K, Mannion KM, Osborne LS, Epsky ND. 2008. Life history of Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on four host plant species under laboratory conditions. Environ. Entomol. 37(3): 630–635.

Black JA dan Dean J C. 2001. Metode dan Masalah Penelitian Sosial. Refika Aditama Bandung.

Ditlinhort. 2009. Waspada serangan kutu putih pada tanaman papaya
http://www.hortikultura.deptan.go.id.18 September 2008.

Meyerdirk DE. 1999. Control of papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Environment Assessment, USDA, APHIS, PPQ, 20 pp.

Monografi Dinas Pertanian. 2009. Dinas Pertanian dan Kehutanan Kabupaten Bogor. Bogor

Rauf A. 2009. Pest Risk Analysis: Paracoccus marginatus. Departemen Proteksi Tanaman, Fakultas Pertanian IPB. 8 pp.

Unterstenhofer G. 1976. The basic principle of crop protection field trials. In Pflaszerschutz. Nachrichten Bayer Vol.XXIX. No.2. Bayer Pflaszerschutz Leverkusen. Hlm 82-180.

Walker A, Hoy M, Meyerdirk D. 2006. Papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink (Insecta: Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)). Featured Creatures. Gainesville, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. http://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/fruit/mealybugs/papaya_mealybug.htm

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Bibliographic Information

Verify authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article as:

Ivakdalam, L.M, 2010. Survei serangan hama baru Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcsidae) pada pertanaman pepaya di Kabupaten Bogor. Agrikan: Jurnal Agribisnis Perikanan 3(2): 60-65. https://doi.org/10.29239/j.agrikan.3.2.60-65
  • Submitted
    28 August 2010
  • Accepted
    28 December 2017
  • Published
    26 October 2010
  • Version of record
    20 November 2018
  • Issue date
    13 October 2010
  • Academic subject
    Pertanian

Keywords

LidyaMIvakdalam, FAPERTA UMMU Ternate. Universitas Muhammadiyah Maluku Utara, Indonesia.

lidya@gmail.com

Available online since October 2017

View full text

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Comments on this article

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.