Research article
Analisis Kelayakan Finansial Usaha Pengolahan Kelapa Parut Kering (Desiccated Coconut) (Studi Kasus Pada PT. Gailolo Coco Industri di Desa Luari Kecamatan Tobelo Utara)
Highlights
Generate NLP AI by Wizdam ID.
Abstract
Kelapa merupakan salah satu penghasil bahan makanan yang sangat penting dalam kehidupan rakyat Indonesia. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari kenyataan bahwa 75% dari minyak nabati dan 8% dari konsumsi protein bersumber dari kelapa. Salah satu hasil dari bagian kelapa yaitu daging kelapa dapat dimanfaatkan sebagai kelapa parut kering (desiccated coconut).Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kelayakan finansial usaha pengolahan kelapa parut kering pada PT.Gailolo Coco IndustridiDesa Luari Kecamatan Tobelo Utara dengan menggunakan kriteria investasi.Hasil analisis kelayakan finansial menunjukkan bahwa usaha pengolahan kelapaparut kering pada PT.Gailolo Coco Industrilayak dan menguntungkan dengan nilai NPV yang positif, sebesar Rp.4,602,431,497.25; nilai Net B/C ratio sebesar 2,91; nilai IRR sebesar 68% atau lebih besar dari suku bunga bank yang berlaku saat ini yaitu 9%; serta nilai PBP yaitu 7 Bulan 15 Hari.
Keywords
Introduction
Section snippets
Material and Methods
Materials and methods from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.
Results
Results from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.
Discussion
Discussion from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.
Conclusions
Conclusions from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.
Acknowledgment
Acknowledgment from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.
Funding Information
UMMU Ternate
Competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Ethical approval acknowledgements
No ethical approval required for this article. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5)
Supplementary files
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study, and/or contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References (11)
Adawyah R. 2007. Pengolahan dan Pengawetan Ikan. PT. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Gray C. 1997. Pengantar Evaluasi Proyek. Edisi Kedua. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.
Pudjosumarto M. 1991. Evaluasi Proyek: Uraian Singkat dan Soal-Jawab. Liberty. Yogyakarta.
Shinta A. 2011. Ilmu Usahatani. UB-Press. Malang.
Soekartawi. 2006. Analisis Usahatani. UI-Press. Jakarta.
Sugiyono. 2007. Statistika untuk Penelitian. CV. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Rahardi F, Hartanto R. 2003. Agribisnis Peternakan. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta
Rangkuti F. 2012. Study Kelayakan Bisnis dan Ivestasi. Kompas Gramedia Building. Jakarta.
Warisno. 2003. Budidaya kelapa genjah. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
Winarno FG. 2008. Kimia Pangan dan Gizi. Ed. Terbaru. M Brio Press. Jakarta.
Zaelanie K, Nurdiani R, Dayuti S. 2004. Teknologi Hasil Perikanan I. Fakultas Perikanan Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.
Bibliographic Information
Cite this article as:
-
Submitted
27 May 2018 -
Accepted
24 July 2019 -
Published
26 July 2018 -
Version of record
26 July 2018 -
Issue date
31 May 2018
-
Academic subject
Pertanian
Copyright
Sangia Advertisement
Terhitung sejak Volume 11 Edisi 1, seluruh naskah yang diterbitkan Agrikan: Jurnal Agribisnis Perikanan telah terakreditasi oleh Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi, Republik Indonesia, dengan Peringkat Akreditasi SInta 4 sesuai dengan Keputusan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi, Republik Indonesia.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Sangia Research Media and Publishing. Production and hosting by Sangia (SRM™).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Comments on this article
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.



