Full Length Article
Study of suitability waters location for seaweed culture in Muna Regency, Indonesia

Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access

Highlights

Generate NLP AI by Wizdam ID.

Abstract

The research aims to determine the location of cultivation at various levels of suitability and identify physical and chemical conditions in the location of seaweed cultivation in the Muna Regency. The study was conducted in June 2018 in 4 (four) stations which are coastal areas of Muna Regency, namely Marobo Village Marobo District (Station 1), Komba-Komba Village Kabangka District (Station 2), Lasunapa Village Duruka District (Station 3), and Bahari Village Towea District (Station 4). Observation and measurement and sampling were carried out at three different locations, namely observation point 1 (a location that was never planted seaweed), observation point 2 (former location of seaweed cultivation), and observation point 3 (location of seaweed cultivation). The results showed that the location of waters for seaweed cultivation in the Muna Regency consisted of appropriate and less appropriate criteria based on the value of the evaluation results of the suitability of the location of waters for seaweed cultivation. These criteria are scattered at each station's observation points. All physical and chemical parameters of the waters in the land suitability criteria become a limiting factor for seaweed growth, at each observation point that is different at each station. All types of seaweed (algae) can live in the waters of Muna Regency, where seaweed species Eucheuma cottonii, Eucheuma spinosum, and Gracilaria sp. are types that are already common in cultivation, and Eucheuma cottonii and Eucheuma spinosum are types that are already popular in seaweed cultivation activists in Muna Regency

Keywords

Waters location
Physical parameters
Chemical parameters
Seaweed
Station

Introduction

Introduction from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Section snippets

Material and Methods

Materials and methods from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Results

Results from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Discussion

Discussion from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Conclusions

Conclusions from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Acknowledgment

Acknowledgment from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Ethical approval acknowledgements

No ethical approval required for this article. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5)

Supplementary files

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study, and/or contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References (1)

Aslan M.L., 1998. Budidaya Rumput Laut. Penerbit Kanisius. Yogyakarta.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Muna 2016. Kabupaten MUna Dalam Angka. vol. 74020.1601, cod. BPS Kabupaten Muna, BPS Kabupaten Muna/BPS-Statistics of Muna Regency. Raha.

Dawes C.J., 1998. Marine botany. John Wiley & Sons.

Hutabarat S., & Evans S.M., 2008. Pengantar Oseanografi Umum. Universitas Indonesia (UI-Pr). Jakarta (ID).

Indriani H., & Suminarsih E., 2003. Budi Daya, Pengolahan dan Pemasaran Rumput Laut. ill.

Jana T.A., 2006. dkk, 2006. Rumput Laut, Pembudidayaan, Pengolahan dan Pemasaran Komoditi Perikanan Potensial, Edisi Kedua, Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.

Kadi A., & Atmadja W.S., 1988. Rumput Laut (Algae) Jenis, Reproduksi, Produksi, Budidaya dan Pasca Panen. PPPO LIPI Jakarta.

Lobban C.S., & Harrison P.J., .1997. 1997. Seaweed ecology and physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Mubarak H., Ilyas S., Ismail W., Wahyuni I.S., Hartati S.T., Pratiwi E., Jangkaru Z., & Arifuddin R., 1990. Petunjuk Teknis Budidaya Rumput Laut. Jakarta (ID): Badan Litbang Pertanian, Puslitbang Perikanan. IDRC, Infish.

Mustafa A., Hasnawi H., Athirah A., Sommeng A., & Ali S.A., 2014. Karakteristik, Kesesuaian, dan Pengelolaan Lahan Untuk Budidaya Di Tambak Kabupaten Pohuwato Provinsi Gorontalo. Jurnal Riset Akuakultur. 9(1):135–149.

Neksidin U., & Pangeran K., 2013. Emiyarti. 2013. Studi kualitas air untuk budidaya rumput laut (Kappaphycus alvarezii) di perairan Teluk Kolono Kabupaten Konawe Selatan. Jurnal Mina Laut Indonesia. 3(12):147–155.

Nontji A., .1993. Laut Nusantara Djambatan. Jakarta.

Priono B., 2016. Budidaya rumput laut dalam upaya peningkatan Industrialisasi perikanan. Media Akuakultur. 8(1):1–8.

Radiarta I.N., Saputra A., & Priono B., 2004. Feasibility mapping of land for development of marine aquaculture in the Gulf Saleh, West Nusa Tenggara. Jurnal Penelitian Perikanan Indonesia. 10(5):19–32.

Ricohermoso M.A., Bueno P.B., & Sulit V.T., 2008. Maximizing opportunities in seaweeds farming. In: Secretariat, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center.

Satari R., Atmaja W.S., Kadi A., & Soelistijo S., 1996. Pengenalan jenis-jenis Rumput laut Indonesia. Puslitbang Oceanologi LIPI. Jakarta.

Sirait M., 2013. Kajian Pengembangan Perikanan Berbasis Komoditas Unggulan di Kabupaten Muna. Jurnal Kelautan. 6(2):150–156. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

Soegiarto A., & Sulistijo M.H., 1978. Rumput laut (alga): manfaat, potensi, dan usaha budidayanya. LON-LIPI, Jakarta. 114hlm.

Sulistijo M.S., 2002. Penelitian Budidaya Rumput Laut (Alga Makro/Seaweed) di Indonesia. Pusat Penelitian Oseanografi Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia. Jakarta.

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Bibliographic Information

Verify authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article as:

Gufana, S.S., Fendi, Karyawati, & Sommeng, A., 2017. Study of suitability waters location for seaweed culture in Muna Regency, Indonesia. Akuatikisle: Jurnal Akuakultur, Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil 1(2): 13-24. https://doi.org/10.29239/j.akuatikisle.1.2.13-24
  • Submitted
    14 September 2017
  • Revised
    30 September 2017
  • Accepted
    12 October 2017
  • Published
    17 November 2017
  • Version of record
    3 December 2017
  • Issue date
    21 November 2017
  • Academic subject
    Aquaculture; Fisheries Science

Keywords

SittiSasrani MutronoGufana, Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna Raha, Sulawesi Tenggara 93654, Indonesia.

sasrani@stipwunaraha.ac.id

Fendi,
. Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanian Wuna Raha, Indonesia Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna Raha, Sulawesi Tenggara 93654, Indonesia.

fenstip@gmail.comorcidOrcid ProfilescholarGoogle Scholar Profile

Karyawati, Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna Raha, Sulawesi Tenggara 93654, Indonesia.

karyawati@stipwunaraha.ac.idscholarGoogle Scholar Profile

AbbasSommeng, Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna Raha, Sulawesi Tenggara 93654, Indonesia Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan, Kabupaten Muna, Sulawesi Tenggara 93654, Indonesia.

abbas.sommeng@stipwunaraha.ac.id

Cultivation is needed to encourage people's economic activities, but is not limited to export commodities such as shrimp. Because it requires a variety of commodities. There are many other commodities that need to be developed, one of which is seaweed. Archipelago areas need to determine the location of cultivation at various levels of suitability and identify their characteristics (physical and chemical).

View full text

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Comments on this article

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.