Research article
Analysis of Rice Field Agribusiness System in Sidomulyo Village, East Wasile District, East Halmahera Regency
Highlights
Generate NLP AI by Wizdam ID.
Abstract
This study aims to determine the agribusiness system, production costs, revenue, income, and feasibility of lowland rice farming in Sidomulyo village. The research location was chosen purposively and the sample was taken using the census sampling method, the number of samples taken was 44 respondents. The analysis technique used is descriptive analysis. The results showed that the lowland rice agribusiness system in Sidomulyo village had been running well starting from the upstream agribusiness subsystem in the form of providing production facilities for fertilizers, medicines, seeds and labor. The subsystem of lowland rice farming using the jajar legowo system includes land cultivation, nursery, planting, fertilizing, use of drugs to harvesting. The downstream subsystem of lowland rice farming includes post-harvest and marketing activities. The subsystem of supporting institutions consists of BP3K which routinely provides counseling guidance and cooperative institutions that provide financing loans for lowland rice farmers, production costs per 10,000 m2 in lowland rice farming are Rp. and rice farming income of Rp. 13,595,218, -. Lowland rice farming is feasible, this can be seen from the R/C value > 1.
Keywords
Introduction
Section snippets
Material and Methods
Materials and methods from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.
Results
Results from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.
Discussion
Discussion from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.
Conclusions
Conclusions from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.
Acknowledgment
Acknowledgment from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.
Funding Information
UMMU Ternate
Competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Ethical approval acknowledgements
No ethical approval required for this article. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5)
Supplementary files
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study, and/or contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References (1)
Amipurba, I. W., & Widiatmi, S. (2018). Perbedaan Usahatani Padi Sehat dan Padi Konvensional (Oriza sativa L.) di Kecamatan Pandak, Kabupaten Bantul. Jurnal Ilmiah Agritas, 2(1), 59-69.
Andalas, M. S., &Sudrajat, S. (2018). Analisis Komparatif Sistem Pertanian Padi Organik dan Anorganik di Desa Catur Kecamatan Sambi Kabupaten Boyolali. Jurnal Bumi Indonesia, 7(1).
BPS. (2018). Provinsi Maluku Utara Dalam Angka. CV. Ardhani.
Fauzan, M. (2016). Pendapatan, Risiko, dan Efisiensi Ekonomi Usaha Tani Bawang Merah di Kabupaten Bantul. Jurnal Agraris. Vol.2 No.2.
Gumbira-Sa’id, E. dan A.H. Intan. (2001). Manajemen Agribisnis. Indonesia:Ghalia.
Pitriyanti, Eni, E., & Triwara, B. S. (2020) Kelayakan Usahatani Padi Semi Organik dan Non Organik di Kabupaten Bantul dalam Bunga Rampai Penelitian Kelayakan Usahatani. K-Media. Yogyakarta.
Rahmawati, N. d. (2017, Juli). Keberanian dalam Mengambil Keputusan dan Risiko oleh Petani Padi Organik di Kabupaten Bantul. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, Vol.3 No.2, 129. doi:https://doi.org/10.18196/agr.3253.
Saragih, Bungaran. 2001. Suara dari Bogor, Membangun Sistem Agribisnis. Penerbit Sucofindo. Bogor.
Soekartawi. (2006). Analisis Usahatani. UI-Press. Jakarta.
Soekartawi. (1995). Analisis Usahatani. UI-Press. Jakarta.
Bibliographic Information
Cite this article as:
-
Submitted
3 June 2021 -
Accepted
22 June 2021 -
Published
22 June 2021 -
Version of record
30 June 2021 -
Issue date
30 May 2021
-
Academic subject
Agriculture
Keywords
Copyright
All Editorial Team of Agrikan journal would like to apologise, because the accreditation rank of Agrikan journal has decreased from Sinta 3 to Sinta 4. We believe, in the future the accreditation rank of Agrikan journal will increase again along with the contribution of authors, reviewers, and readers. We hope that your contribution will continue to increase without any impact from the accreditation rating.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Sangia Research Media and Publishing. Production and hosting by Sangia (SRM™). 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Comments on this article
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.