Skip to Main Content Skip to article

Full Length Article
The effect of deacetylation temperature on quality crab chitosan (Portunus pelagicus)

Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access

Highlights

Generate NLP AI by Wizdam ID.

Abstract

Crab (Portunus pelagicus) is a fishery export commodity, especially to Japan, the European Union and the United States. On the other hand, the crab part, namely the shell, is still not utilized optimally so it becomes waste. To make crab shells valuable, several studies have revealed the presence of useful substances known as chitin and chitosan. Therefore, this research was carried out with the aim of knowing the effect of deacetylation temperature on the quality of chitosan and the optimal deacetylation temperature so as to produce good quality chitosan. Method: This study employs an experimental methodology based on Fully Randomized Design (CRD) analysis. Several deacetylation temperature treatments (00C, 900C, 950C, 1000C, 1050C, 1100C, 1150C, 1200C) were repeated three times in this study's design. Analyses of yield, moisture content, ash content, protein content, and acetyl content serve as test parameters. Result: The results showed that the treatment using different deacetylation temperatures had a very significant effect (Fcrit > Ftable 1%) on water content, ash content, protein content, acetyl content and had no significant effect (Fcrit > Ftable 5%) on the yield. The optimal deacetylation temperature was 1200C, with a yield of 19.050%, water content of 8.340%, ash content of 0.022%, protein content of 0.198%, and acetyl content of 84.870%. Conclusion: The conclusion based on analysis that the best temperature deacetylation in producing quality chitosan crab is 1200C.

Keywords

Crab
Chitosan
Deacetylation
Temperature

Introduction

Introduction from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Section snippets

Material and Methods

Materials and methods from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Results

Results from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Discussion

Discussion from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Conclusions

Conclusions from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Acknowledgment

Acknowledgment from the full-text PDF of this article cannot be displayed.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Ethical approval acknowledgements

No ethical approval required for this article. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5)

Supplementary files

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study, and/or contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Bibliographic Information

Verify authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article as:

Ula, M., Anshar, Karyawati, Samsibar, Rakhfid, A., & Rochmady, 2025. The effect of deacetylation temperature on quality crab chitosan (Portunus pelagicus). Akuatikisle: Jurnal Akuakultur, Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil 9(1): 15-20. https://doi.org/10.29239/j.akuatikisle.9.1.15-20
  • Submitted
    15 November 2024
  • Revised
    16 December 2024
  • Accepted
    8 January 2025
  • Published
    17 January 2025
  • Version of record
    11 May 2025
  • Issue date
    31 May 2025
  • Academic subject
    Aquaculture; Fisheries Science

Keywords

MosriulaUla, Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanian Wuna, Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto Km. 7 Lasalepa, Raha, Sulawesi Tenggara 93654, Indonesia.

ahmadmohtarmosriula18@gmail.comscholarGoogle Scholar Profile

Anshar, Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanian Wuna, Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto Km. 7 Lasalepa, Raha, Sulawesi Tenggara 93654, Indonesia.

ansharstip@gmail.com

Karyawati, Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanian Wuna, Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto Km. 7 Lasalepa, Raha, Sulawesi Tenggara 93654, Indonesia.

karyawati@gmail.comscholarGoogle Scholar Profile

Samsibar, Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanian Wuna, Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto Km. 7 Lasalepa, Raha, Sulawesi Tenggara 93654, Indonesia.

samsibar@gmail.com
Abdul  Rakhfid

AbdulRakhfid, Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanian Wuna, Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto Km. 7 Lasalepa, Raha, Sulawesi Tenggara 93654, Indonesia Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan, Kabupaten Muna, Sulawesi Tenggara 93654, Indonesia.

Rochmady  Rochmady

Rochmady, Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanian Wuna, Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto Km. 7 Lasalepa, Raha, Sulawesi Tenggara 93654, Indonesia Coastal and Isle Research Group, Coastal and Small Island Studies Centre (CSISC), Jl. Haluoleo No.10, Anduonohu, Poasia, Kendari City, South East Sulawesi 93232, Indonesia.

View full text

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Comments on this article

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.